But that doesn’t translate into voter or legislative decisions, unfortunately. We know what doesn’t work, and we know what works. “Despite being a liberal state, California still has some of the most critical barriers to education. “Latinos are doing better in Texas than in California in terms of college completion rates,” said Flores. The report also revealed that, following the ban, students of color were less likely to get college degrees, graduate degrees, or jobs in the STEM fields. In California, where race-conscious affirmative action has been outlawed since 1996, these ripple effects have already been playing out.Ī 2020 study from the University of California, Berkeley found Black and Latinx student enrollment in California’s public universities declined since the ban. “My fear is if there is no respect for health care, there will certainly be no respect for educational opportunity,” she said.įlores noted that restricting or banning race in admissions would likely disproportionately hurt Black and Latinx students. Stella Flores, an associate professor of higher education and public policy at the University of Texas at Austin, voiced concern over such stances. “ Grutter was wrongly decided the day it was released,” said Westhill. The court ruled in that case in support of holistic admissions programs, saying that race could be considered as one factor among many to reach educational diversity. Bollinger decision as one of those “precedential wrongs” to be righted. Westhill referred to the Supreme Court’s 2003 Grutter v. These are Justices ready to right a number of precedential wrongs, and I think Roe is among them.” This court is prepared to say what the law is and not be incremental. “Because if they are going to do this with Roe, then these are some stiff-spined Justices. “As soon as that leak was confirmed as authentic by the Chief Justice, the first thing that came to my mind was that they are going to abolish affirmative action,” said Westhill. CEO states on its website that it promotes “colorblind, equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in America.” They are ideologically cut from the same cloth as the other three.”ĭevon Westhill, president and general counsel at the Center for Equal Opportunity (CEO), a conservative think tank, agreed and applauded the draft opinion on Roe. “There is no reason that Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney Barrett will take different points of view. “I have to say that it doesn’t take much insight to guess what’s going to happen with affirmative action because we have Justice Roberts, Thomas, and Alito already having written dissenting opinions in previous affirmative action cases,” said Victor Goode, an associate professor at the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law. Yet today’s conservative supermajority has shifted the playing field dramatically. The court has upheld similar programs before, most recently in 2016. In January, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) are lawful. Now affirmative action may be on the chopping block. Yet many experts say the court is unlikely to significantly, if at all, alter its stance. The draft is not the final decision, which will come next month. Last week's leaked draft opinion over Roe from the conservative supermajority court would take away the federal right to abortion, which was established in the 1973 case. “That is the part that bears on how this court might approach affirmative action, voting rights, and other fundamental civil rights.” Gary Orfield, a professor of education, law, political science, and urban planning at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and co-director of UCLA’s Civil Rights Project. “This is a court that has little regard for precedent and a very strong belief that it knows what the Constitution truly means-and that everything that happened before this court may be wrong and may be discarded,” said Dr. Wade, which would upset fifty years of precedent, it appears that race-conscious affirmative action may be next on the docket. Supreme Court’s draft opinion to overturn Roe v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |